http://stephendann.com/2009/10/11/the-pear-necessities-pear-analyticss-pointless-babble-beta-needs-more-work/ One marketer, one blog, many words Tue, 07 Sep 2010 03:51:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 http://stephendann.com/2009/10/11/the-pear-necessities-pear-analyticss-pointless-babble-beta-needs-more-work/comment-page-1/#comment-949 Ryan Kelly Thu, 15 Oct 2009 04:39:16 +0000 http://stephendann.com/?p=817#comment-949 Sorry to disappoint Stephen, but we are delaying the release date of the next study, and will probably have it by end of the month. Also, to briefly comment on your observation above, half of those tweets you are seeing were voted "down" in the Philtro tool, which will vary from our criteria of tweets having no RT, short URL, etc. I believe our criteria is more strict for defining what is babble and what is not, and if you left it up to the user, the percentage would be much higher. That's my theory anyway, and hope to prove/disprove that in the next study. Sorry to disappoint Stephen, but we are delaying the release date of the next study, and will probably have it by end of the month. Also, to briefly comment on your observation above, half of those tweets you are seeing were voted “down” in the Philtro tool, which will vary from our criteria of tweets having no RT, short URL, etc. I believe our criteria is more strict for defining what is babble and what is not, and if you left it up to the user, the percentage would be much higher. That’s my theory anyway, and hope to prove/disprove that in the next study.

]]>